The great English novelist and essayist Dorothy Sayers once wrote, “…. it is no wonder that the women were first at the cradle and last at the cross. They had never known a man like Jesus – there had never been such another.” The woman of this morning’s gospel lesson is undoubtedly one of whom Sayers wrote. It is certain to say that she had never known a man alike Jesus, that there had never been such another.
The mere fact of the conversation between them would have been unusual enough in her experience. According to the social norms of Jesus’ day, men and women, particularly strangers, did not engage in passing conversation. But passing theological conversation between strange men and women, such as this was, would have been utterly unheard of. Theological conversation between men and women was actually prohibited by Jewish religious law. Add to this that the woman was a Samaritan. There too was a prohibition in Jewish religious law against all contact between Jew and Samaritan. The Jews deemed the Samaritans heretical and unclean. Their animosity towards them was intense.
And add to this the Samaritan woman was of suspect moral virtue. By her own admission she had had five husbands and was now living with a man without benefit of marriage. Even by today’s thoroughly libertine standards, this constitutes suspect moral virtue. It accounts too for the reason she was at the well alone at noon in the first place.
The well in Jesus’ day was not merely a place to draw water, it was a social center of a community. The members of a community gathered at the well in the relative cool of dusk to socialize and exchange the day’s news. A woman who had had five husbands and was living with a man without benefit of marriage would have been about as welcome in a social center of a community, again, as she would be today. And so she drew her water alone at noon.
Yet Jesus entered into conversation with her. As I said, it is certain to say she had never known a man like Jesus, that there had never been such another. Further indication of this is that immediately following their conversation, the Samaritan woman, despite her self-consciousness about her marginalization in her community, rushed unselfconsciously back to her community to share with it her conversation with Jesus.
And so, we may conclude from this morning’s gospel lesson that Jesus in a way unprecedented in their experience, entered into conversation with women, even women with more strikes against them than mere womanhood, and in so doing engaged them, elevated them, and evangelized them.
But we miss the point entirely if we stop here. Because Jesus entered into conversation not especially or particularly with women, but too with the disenfranchised, insignificant, and scandalous of virtually every imaginable description – those suffering from spiritual torment and mental illness, those afflicted with infectious diseases, the handicapped, criminals, prostitutes, adulteresses, slaves, foreigners, tax collectors, peasants, children……Jesus did not shun any of them. And all of them he engaged, elevated, and evangelized.
But we miss the point still if we stop here. Because Jesus entered into conversation not especially or particularly with the disenfranchised, scandalous, and insignificant, but too with those on the upper echelons of the social ladder – the educated, wealthy, and powerful. Jesus entered into conversation with the rabbis of the temple, lawyers, Scribes, Pharisees, Sadducees, a rich young ruler, and even the Roman procurator of Judea, Pontius Pilate.
It must be conceded that Jesus, with his penetrating discernment of human motivation was keenly aware that those on the upper rungs of the social ladder, through self-satisfaction or arrogance over their deemed accomplishments and standing were prone to disdain for or affront to Jesus’ conversation, but still he entered into conversation with them.
The point is Jesus entered into conversation with everyone – all with equal integrity, authority, and concern. Everyone who met him in fact could say that they had never known a man like Jesus, that there had never been such another. He recognized no particularity whatsoever.
And what are we to make of this? What are we to take from it? We need only return to this morning’s gospel lesson for an answer. Jesus’ conversation with the Samaritan woman led her to believe that he was a prophet, and so she sought from him clarification about something she had never understood. “The Samaritans worship on this mountain, but the Jews say worship must take place in Jerusalem.” Jesus replied, “Woman believe me, the hour is coming when you will worship neither place. The hour is coming, indeed is here, when true worshipers will worship the Father in Spirit and Truth.”
Jesus declared to the Samaritan woman that the hour is coming when true worshipers will worship the Father without reference to the particularities of Jew and Samaritan, indeed without reference to any particularities – particularities of gender, denomination, orientation, nationality, race, class, age – because true worshipers will worship the Father in that which will override particularities and declare humankind one – the Spirit and Truth he would bestow upon his church.
This then is why Jesus entered into conversation with everyone – to invite everyone beyond their particularities to his church. And his invitation was as radical and universal as his love. He invited everyone. He invited everyone. It sure sounds good. But that open invitation has issued a strenuous challenge to the church since its inception. The very first Christians wondered with dismay and chagrin – Surely Jesus could not have meant the Gentiles? But of course he did, and that strenuous challenge is now our own – to be the church in the fullness of our particularities, in this complex and confusing post modern world in which the fullness of our particularities have overrun and overwhelmed us.
But the test of whether we are the church is how well we meet this strenuous challenge. Perhaps precisely when we experience the dismay and chagrin of the first Christians, it may signal particularities we must struggle to overcome. Perhaps too it is the very calling of Christians to engage in strenuous challenges and without them we become jejune and feckless.
One thing is certain, it is only by his Spirit and Truth that our efforts to be the church will succeed, so let it be our common commitment to enter fully into that Spirit and Truth, and in so doing endeavor to unite with all those who with us in his Spirit and Truth declare him Lord. Amen.