II Isaiah

Scriptural Sermons

Old Testament: II Isaiah

By Rebecca Clancy May 20, 2020
In 2001 the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution marking September 21 of each year as an International Day of Peace. The intention of the resolution was for the entire world to observe simultaneously one day of nonviolence. Not surprisingly, the World Council of Churches, in support of the resolution, has requested that the churches of the world designate the Sunday prior to promote the cause of peace. I was asked to opt this church in, and I agreed to do so certain that it would not ruffle any feathers. Because, of course, we are all in support the cause of peace. We all believe that peace has priority over violence; and that even when violence is such that it justifies greater violence to end it, as in the case of Nazi Germany, that peace is always the final aim. Yes, we are all in support the cause of peace. If we had any issue with the cause of peace, no doubt it would be that we feel that there is little we can do to bring it to pass. The cause of peace seems outside our hands. What can we do, after all? What can we do about the Islamic State except to look on in utter horror at the video recordings of the beheading and burning foreign civilians? The Islamic State has now seized large chunks of Syrian and Iraq, and spewing refugees in the direction of Europe. That these refugees would risk the lives of themselves and their children in a desperate and dangerous search for sanctuary indicates that it treats its own civilians little better. And I just read that the refugee crisis is just getting started. This is just the warm up. Even the world’s political leaders do not know what to do about any of this, so what can we do? And how about Afghanistan? I was listening to one of the many speeches given at the anniversary of 9/11. The speaker reported that the Islamic State is making gains there too, and the Taliban has not exactly folded its hand. He ended by warning that if we turn our back on Afghanistan and withdraw our support to their police, we are at serious risk for another 9/11. Another 9/11. Again, what can we do? And of course, there’s always Israel/Palestine. The U.S. State Department last week condemned the sharp escalation of violence between Israelis and Palestinians. That tinder box is not going anywhere, and neither is the power keg that is Iran for that matter, deal or no deal. And this is just the Middle East! What about Africa? What about Russia? The point is, we rightly feel there is little we can do to bring the cause of peace to pass. The cause of peace rightly seems out of our hands. But unfortunately for our pessimism and defeatism, the Bible proclaims the opposite. The Bible proclaims that there is much we can do to bring the cause of peace to pass. The Bible proclaims that the cause of peace is in our hands. And so, perhaps we should consider the matter a bit further. In this morning’s Old Testament lesson, the prophet Isaiah declares that the coming Messiah will be the Prince of Peace. But peace here is not peace in the sense that you might think; it does not mean peace between nations. It does not mean peace in the sense of the end of war through defeat, surrender, negotiation, or truce. Peace here means peace in the sense of shalom. Shalom means inner peace. It means the peace that derives from reconciliation and restoration and redemption. It means the peace of wholeness, integration, and completion. It is the peace that mirrors the shalom of God, and the peace indeed that God bestows. The coming Messiah then would be the Prince of Peace not in any political way but in a way that transcends politics. He would be the Prince of Peace by bestowing inner peace to individuals. And this if you think about it, is exactly what the coming Messiah did. He was indeed the Prince of Peace in this sense. In this morning’s gospel lesson, Jesus is soon to be crucified and resurrected, his holy spirit soon to be released in history. And so he says to his disciples, “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled, and do not let them be afraid.” The peace he promises is the same as that declared by Isaiah. It is the peace of shalom. And indeed, on that first Easter evening when Jesus releases his holy spirit in history, he declares to his disciples, “Peace be with you.” His holy spirit in history is nothing less than the peace of shalom. And why is this? What is the Bible recognizing about the peace of shalom? The Bible is recognizing that the peace of shalom is the real basis for peace; that peace does not begin with peace between nations. It does not begin with the end of war through defeat, negotiation, surrender, or truce. It begins with the peace of shalom. It begins with inner peace. It begins in the hearts of individuals. It’s ironic that in its own way, the religion of the Mid East with whom we have such conflict recognizes something very similar. Jihad in Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. It is the struggle that takes place within each individual in giving his or her heart to God. Both the Bible and the Koran provide the real basis for peace. And so, there is indeed much we can do to bring the cause of peace to pass. The cause of peace indeed is in our hands. We need only receive the holy spirit of Jesus Christ that has been released in history. We need only receive his peace of shalom. Through it we can certainly bring peace to those whose lives we touch. And this is something at least. But we can do more. If we observe an International Day of Peace understood rightly, understood that the real basis for peace is shalom; and if our brothers and sisters in the Mid East, and all across the world do the same thing, then we observe, if just for a day, that peace is possible. Indeed, it is God’s own intention and hope for the world that he created and redeemed through his son. Let it be our intention and hope as well. May peace prevail on earth. Amen.
By Rebecca Clancy May 20, 2020
Tokenism. I guess there are worse crimes, but there are no crimes more insidious. Tokenism pretends to take cause with the plight of its victim. It pretends to take responsibility to right the wrong. But proof of the pretense is the form thrust effort it makes – an effort that is not committed, not sustained, not costly, not relevant, and so not effective. In fact, the only thing the form thrust effort produces is a false sense of righteousness. Sad to say, I think that we as a culture have come to mark Lent with something akin to tokenism, with the notion that a form thrust effort discharges our Lenten obligation and that for having made it, we are righteous. I got first inkling of this the morning following Ash Wednesday. I was listening to a morning radio show in which the host and hostess of the show were conducting inane deliberations over what they should give up for Lent. The hostess was only certain of what she wasn’t willing to give up. "Well it’s not going to be chocolate, and it’s not going to be coffee, and it’s not going to be booze, and it’s not going to be profanity!" she giggled. Apparently what ever she was willing to give up would involve no sacrifice whatsoever. The host was certain of what he was going to give up. He was going to give up beer. Beer, he lamented, was having a bad effect on his waistline. "It’s not just you ladies who are getting ready for bikini season," He joked. "I am planning to exchange one six pack for another." I got my next inkling of this the following day at a local coffee house. Seated at the table next to me were two women. One of them, taking an enormous bite out of a paczki, complained peevishly to the other, “I’m really dying for a brownie, but I gave up chocolate for Lent.” I will spare you the inkling that followed that one, and the one that followed that one, and the one that followed that one. It is a great enough miscarriage of Lent to mark it with tokenism, but miscarriage crosses over to mockery when even tokenism is practiced self-servingly or with grievance. Again and again we render our faith as vacuous as our culture, then harbor the suspicion that our faith lacks power and truth for our lives. So how then are we to mark lent, how should we reclaim it from our culture so that our faith, especially in this holiest of seasons, may be repossessed of power and truth for our lives? Lent’s true meaning is found in a heartfelt remembrance of the sacrifice that Jesus made for our sin. And so, let us consider that sacrifice: It was John the Baptist’s proclamation that the Kingdom of God was at hand that first stirred in Jesus the sense that what had been portended by his miraculous birth was now unfolding. And so, Jesus went down to Judea to be baptized by John. Upon Jesus’ baptism, Jesus sense was confirmed. The heavens opened, the Spirit descended upon him, and the voice of God declared, “You are my son, my beloved one, with you I am well pleased.” It was indeed unfolding, but that was not all. At his baptism the voice of God also imparted to him that he would be required to make the supreme sacrifice; that he would be required to die. This was because the voice of God declared that Jesus was his beloved one. Jesus knew who God’s beloved one was. He knew it because he knew Scripture, and the prophet Isaiah had foretold five hundred years prior that God’s beloved one would be held of no account, would be oppressed and afflicted, would be despised and rejected by humanity, and finally, cut off from the land of the living. In short, God’s beloved one would be required to make the supreme sacrifice. He would be required to die. Jesus then proceeded to meet his fate. It was a fate met no easier by the fact that he was the Son of God. That offered him no protection, for in order that he share completely our common lot, the divinity within Jesus, as Paul reminds us in this morning’s epistle lesson, did not regard equality with God as something to be grasped, but emptied itself and took the form of a slave. Jesus was fully human. We need only imagine how his fate would have been for us to know how it was for him – his anxiety and concern, his loneliness and fear, his sorrow and suffering, and, as this morning’s gospel lesson reminds us, his terrible temptation to avoid his fate, to renounce it, which he was at all times perfectly free to do. To prepare him for his fate, Jesus, immediately following his baptism, was led by the Spirit into the wilderness. He fasted for forty days and nights, after which the tempter appeared to him. The tempter knew his art well, for he appealed to Jesus with the promise that he could have it both ways – that he could still be God’s beloved one, yet he need not make the supreme sacrifice; he need not die. He could be God’s beloved one by providing the people with bread and a just political order. What good would his death accomplish? What good does any death accomplish? But Jesus mastered this temptation. And so the tempter bided his time until the very end of Jesus’ ministry when Jesus’ death was squarely before him. Jesus’ determination to die, the tempter knew, would hold fast at the beginning of his ministry when his death was far off, but timing, the tempter knew, is everything. What’s more, the time allotted for Jesus’ ministry had been so short. Less than one year. He had spent it preparing for his death as best he could – teaching the people about the coming Kingdom of God his death would inaugurate, prefiguring its power and quality in his mighty works, instructing his disciples what lay ahead….But his ministry had been fragmentary and incomplete. Had he done enough? Would they figure it out? Would they come to understand? The tempter too knew too to prey upon these concerns. And true to the tempter’s hope, in the darkness of his last night, moments before his arrest, Jesus faltered. He threw himself to the ground and distraught begged his father to find another way. “Father if it is possible let this cup pass from me.” But his father was silent. The tempter waited with baited breath, but Jesus mastered this temptation as well. He recovered himself and said unto his father’s silence, “Thy will be done.” The tempter saw his final chance as Jesus hung suffering on his cross. The worst still lay ahead for him, as anyone who has witnessed death agony knows. “If you are the Son of God, save yourself!” came the tempter’s voice through the jeers of the crowd. Again, Jesus overcame this temptation until the very last moment of his life. The physical agony of crucifixion, the emotional agony of the rejection, hatred, and betrayal of all humanity, the spiritual agony of the steadfast silence of his father overcame him. Broken and shattered he cried out, “My God, My God, Why have you forsaken me?” His faith and obedience gave way, but for the tempter it was too late. Jesus had made the supreme sacrifice. He was dead. Lent’s true meaning then is found in first in remembrance of the sacrifice of Jesus, and then, simply, in honest reflection about our own lives over against that sacrifice. It is found in reflection about questions like these: Have we ourselves, acceding to our culture, come to allow Jesus’ sacrifice for our sin to hold so little import that we trivialize or mock it through tokenism? Do we live lives worthy of his sacrifice? Are we loyal to him? Does he come first in our lives? Could we stand before him? Do we acknowledge the gulf between God’s righteousness and our sin that called forth his sacrifice for us? And we will know if we have found Let’s true meaning if our reflection issues in repentance, which particularly in lent, but in every season of the Christian year, is the practice and mark of the true Christian. Amen.
Share by: