Blog Layout

Mother's Day

Rebecca Clancy

Luke 11:26-28

On my last trip to our family farm, I was out for a morning run on the beautiful and nearly untraveled country roads that surround it. Suddenly a preternatural howl pierced the air. I stopped dead in my tracks. My blood ran cold. I looked around me and saw nothing. I had no idea whatsoever what to do. As far as I know, there is no manual for what to do when you’re out in the middle of nowhere and a preternatural howl pierces the air. Come to think of it, the only manuals for what to do are for things you can pretty much figure out by yourself. My first response was irrational – “Demonic forces are abroad.” My second response was more in the direction of rationality – “It must have been the scream of a bird high overhead.” 

I was about to continue my run when I heard it again. It was just as blood curdling as before, but it sounded slightly less preternatural. It was coming from a declivity to the side of the road. I grabbed a stick to arm myself and peered down. The howl was coming from a cat. It looked like the feline version of the Hound of the Baskervilles. It was scrawny and scraggly and mangy, its face grotesquely contorted as it let out another howl. 

Then I saw what it was howling at. A huge raccoon was squared off against it; about a foot separated their faces. As far as I know, there is no manual for what to do when you’re out in the middle of nowhere and you encounter a huge raccoon squared off against a cat. One thing was certain. I couldn’t let nature take its course. The cat didn’t stand a chance. So I thrust my stick in the direction of the raccoon, trusting that it wouldn’t attack me, that my mere human presence would scare it away. But neither the cat nor the raccoon even noticed me, so intent they were with one another. I grabbed some stones and began to pelt the raccoon. After a few good shots, it ran off.

It was then I saw what was really going on. Under the cat there was a litter of three kittens, and a litter newly born. They were in a wet knot, their eyes shut tight. The cat had been driven, no sooner than having given birth, to protect her young. Suddenly, I felt kinship with the cat as a fellow mother. I felt grateful that I had never been driven to protect my young, but noted that if the day should ever come, the preternatural howl is an effective means.

I ran back to the farm for all that I was worth. My mom saw me barreling down the driveway and said, “Nice pace,” she said. “How was your run?” “Oh, unremarkable,” I replied. I didn’t want her to contravene my intentions. I procured a big box, some old towels, and heavy gloves, and jumped in my van. I returned to the fateful spot. There were by this time six kittens. The cat put up no fight as I lifted the new family into the box and relocated it to a safe corner in the barn. That cat and I have become soul mates. I swear she understands that what I did was from one mother to another.

And it’s true enough, really. My instinct as a human mother may be more developed and complex than hers, but our common instinct to protect our children is indeed a biological response that all mothers share. This is not to be reductive about the mystery and miracle of motherhood. It is, rather, to celebrate the mystery and miracle of motherhood as something that inheres in our biological beings.

Oddly enough, Scripture dwells very little on these matters. By deduction one could argue that the Old Testament at least jibes with what I have said about motherhood. The prologue to the book of Genesis declares that God created all that here is; that his creation bears his purposeful wisdom and order; and that it is good. Ergo, this biological mother love, you could call it, is created by God. It bears his purposeful wisdom and order and is good. It is something to acknowledge him for, and to thank and praise him for.

When we turn to the New Testament for its teaching on motherhood, again there is not much to go one. But what’s there is something of a mood wrecker. Recall for instance this morning’s gospel lesson. Jesus was out among the people – teaching, challenging the religious leadership of his day, as he was want to do. A woman in the crowd, called out to him with unbridled enthusiasm, “Blessed is the womb that bore you and the breasts that nursed you.”  

But Jesus, in what can only be construed as a rebuff, rejoined, “Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and obey it.” And it is not only here that Jesus had distressingly forceful and seemingly hostile things to say about motherhood. How about these words from the very next chapter of Luke’s gospel, “Do you suppose I came to grant peace on this earth? I tell you no, but rather division. They will be divided – father against son, mother against daughter….”

The New Testament teaching on motherhood may constitute one of the few times that Christians, who in my experience, and to my dismay, seem eager to bypass the Old Testament to get to the New, given the choice would probably opt for the teaching of the Old Testament. But of course, this is Jesus speaking and so we must, as he always put it, have the ears to hear him. So what does Jesus mean by these difficult teachings?

Jesus, rest assured, does not speak as one hostile to motherhood. Jesus in his ministry showed great compassion to mothers. When a widow had lost her only son and his body was being carried from the house, Jesus, deeply moved, comforted her and raised her son from the dead. When a Gentile woman, a woman of a people traditionally hostile to the Jews, begged Jesus to cure her daughter, he did so.

And Jesus clearly loved his own mother. In one of the most poignant passages of the whole New Testament, Jesus, nailed to his cross and seeing his anguished mother at his feet called to his beloved disciple, “Behold your mother.” Jesus, dying, wanted to ensure that his mother would be cared for, and so entrusted her to his beloved disciple. Jesus affirmed motherhood, and he loved his mother.

But there is something that Jesus valued more than any familial tie, and that is the kingdom of God; the kingdom to which he has called us to become citizens. That kingdom first. That kingdom foremost. That kingdom with no prior or higher allegiances. Indeed, that kingdom as the interpreter of all other allegiances. One must not put his hand to the plow and look back. One must not even stop to bury his dead, so urgent and utmost was Jesus’ call to the kingdom of God. And that kingdom is founded upon God’s love – a love that transcends familial ties, a love that shows no preference or partiality; a love that is all encompassing and all embracing – a love that is universal.

Jesus knew the human heart so well. He knew that love such as a mother’s could easily tend toward interest in her own children to the exclusion or at the expense of others. In the zeal of her love, she could make her family the thing in itself -- clannish, self-contained, and closed off – a proud bulwark over against others, rather than the place where her children learn the love of the kingdom of God. It is here that Jesus spoke a cautionary word to mothers.  

The Christian mother then will discipline the tendency of her love, the tendency rooted in her biological mother love, so that it is controlled by the love of the kingdom of God. This means that she will strive to raise children who will love not only within the family, but who will reflect the love they have received in the family out to others – out to those who are in such great need of love – the poor, the ailing, the heartbroken, the hopeless, the lonely, and even out to their enemies.

The love of the Christian mother has been created by God at the deepest level of her biological being, but as that love is recreated by the love of the kingdom of God, it is set free to be what love is meant to be and what true love is – that is boundless. As the Christian mother opens her heart to the boundless love of the kingdom of God, she might well be amazed by the depth, breadth, and height of love she finds there, and what can be accomplished for her children and for her world through it. Amen.



By Rebecca Clancy August 3, 2022
Pharaoh, King of Egypt, enslaved the People of Israel. It was not out, as you might assume, out of cruelty. It was, rather, out of judiciousness. The People of Israel were not Egyptians. They were foreigners. They were the rough equivalent of what we today would call the undocumented. So now as then they were deemed to be threats. Add to this that the People of Israel grew increasingly numerous, as numerous even as the Egyptians themselves. This intensified the threat. In those numbers they could simply take over. Or Egypt’s enemies could induce them to fight for them, as a kind of built in fifth column. Pharaoh, King of Egypt, had to act. And so he enslaved the People of Israel. It was the judicious thing to do. But his judiciousness was not rewarded. In slavery, unpredictably, their numbers only increased. Pharaoh’s patience with the People of Israel grew thin. Judiciousness then crossed over to cruelty. He ordered the Hebrew midwives to murder the infant boys as they delivered them. That would thin their ranks. But the Hebrew midwives refused to do so, and with their refusal, civil disobedience was born. They chose to heed God not man. But Pharaoh King of Egypt was not so easily undone. He ordered his army to search out the infant boys and throw them into the Nile. Thereafter, cruelty no doubt took on a life of its own. Pharaoh King of Egypt rightly ranks with the likes of Caligula, Nero, Hitler, Stalin, and Mao. One wonders why it is that so many who rise to power become murderous and maniacal tyrants. The human cost - the suffering and misery and despair and tragedy -- are unimaginable and incalculable. Against this backdrop, a woman from the house of Levi gave birth to a healthy and beautiful infant boy. It would normally be the occasion for celebration and joy, but it was for her the occasion for anguish. When a child is born, a mother’s first instinct is protectiveness. But how could she possibly protect him? She thought desperately at first that she could hide him, and she did so for several months, but that could not go on forever. He could any day be discovered. The lesser of two evils was to abandon him to his fate. So she plastered a reed basket with bitumen and pitch, and she cast her hope upon the water. Low and behold, the daughter of Pharaoh happened upon the basket. She peered into it, beheld the crying infant, and she had compassion. The daughter of Pharaoh has never received the appreciation and respect she deserves. She is, inexplicably, overlooked. What she did was exemplary. Normally when people enslave others, they find justification for it. The enslaved are not deemed the equal of their enslavers. They are deemed subhuman. Slavery, therefore, is a necessity. More than this, it is morally right. That’s what the South advanced in this country, after all. But the daughter of Pharaoh did not fall prey to justification. She had compassion. And she acted upon that compassion. Here is an important reminder. It is not enough to have compassion. To have compassion, or any other altruistic emotion for that matter, does not make you a good person. You must act upon it. If you have compassion and you do not act upon it, that makes you decidedly less than a good person. As Martin Luther King, Jr. famously declared, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” And here is something truly astounding. Her act was to adopt him. That was, to say at the least, a courageous thing to do. It certainly would not have put her in good stead with her father. I can just imagine it. “Father, I have a surprise for you. You have a new grandson.” Such an announcement could only have dumbfounded him, but his confusion would have given way to horror as she went on, “I have adopted an infant boy from among your slaves.” If nothing else, we can now set the record straight. We can give Pharaoh’s daughter the appreciation and respect that she deserves. But we can do more than that. As I said, she is exemplary, and so we can follow her example. We can show compassion to those who have cast their hope upon the water. Yes, a mother forced by dire circumstance to give her child up for adoption, hoping that her child will be loved and cherished. But too, one with an atypical identity, hoping to be accepted for who he or she really is. One of a different race, creed, or income level seeking to relocate, hoping not that she will be welcomed, for that would be too high a hope; but hoping she will be at least be tolerated. One who has transgressed, hoping he will be forgiven. One who has something difficult to impart, hoping she will be understood. We can show compassion for those who have cast their hope upon the water. For someone greater, much greater than Pharaoh’s daughter did the same. “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on us!” “My daughter has just died. Come and lay your hand on her, that she may live.” “Even now I know that God will give you whatever you ask of him.” “Jesus, come before my son dies.” “Lord, if you choose, you can make me clean.” “Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David, for my daughter is tormented by a demon.” “Lord, have mercy on my son, for he is an epileptic and suffers terribly.” “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom” They cast their hope on him. And he showed compassion for them all. And when we cast our hope on him, he will show compassion for us -- unlimited even by a cross. Amen.
By Rebecca Clancy August 3, 2022
I attended a funeral recently. It was for my high school math teacher. He was one great guy. Everyone loved him. He taught math at my high school for forty years, and he also coached wrestling. By the time he retired, he had become something of a legend in his own time. The funeral was upbeat, not like so many funerals that are so very sad. He lived a full and long life, and we gathered to celebrate that. But for one man – a classmate of mine who wrestled for him. He was absolutely devastated. I approached him in the parking lot after the funeral and asked if he was okay. He broke down. “That man was everything to me,” he said. “I was O.K. so long as he was in the world.” Then he shared his story. His mother died when he was very young. His father was a physically and emotionally abusive alcoholic. By the time he was in high school, he was far down a bad road. He hadn’t the support to do well at school, so he didn’t. He was very angry, so he was a behavior problem. The only friends he could make were kids like himself, so he hung out with a tough crowd. And he had begun to dabble in drugs. He was pretty much a lost cause at the age of sixteen. Enter my math teacher. He approached him one day out of the blue and told him he could tell by his gait that he was born to wrestle. This could only have been a ruse to intervene. Even I, who knows nothing about wrestling, am suspicious that you can identify one born to wrestle by his gait. At any rate, the ruse worked. He intervened. And he made him into a great wrestler. On top of that, he made him into a great young man. His advice, understanding, and support were unwavering. He helped him to deal with his past in such a way that it didn’t destroy him. He filled his present with new found responsibility, purpose, structure, and discipline. And he paved his way to a future. After graduation he went to college on a wrestling scholarship and eventually became a doctor. “I feel so lost,” he concluded his story. “What am I going to do now?” While he was sharing his story, I could not help but think how hard life can be. We here are generally prosperous and privileged, so we can afford to put up a front. But behind that front life can be hard. Because it’s out there -- loss, abuse, addiction, and a host of other afflictions. It’s enough to make you lose your way. And as I said, we here are generally prosperous and privileged. What if the loss, abuse, and addiction are compounded by poverty or racism? Then it’s all but a foregone conclusion. Your way is lost. Yes, life can be hard. Life takes casualties. Lots of them. It can make us feel helpless and overwhelmed. We want to make things better, but what could we possibly do? The answer is no farther away than my late math teacher. What could we possibly do to make things better? We could reach out, like he did. And what is in view here is not merely a good example, although we must never underestimate the power of a good example and must always strive to be one. But there’s more in view than that. It has to do with the Bible. The Bible may seem like a forbidding book. For one thing it’s thousands of pages long. It makes War and Peace look like a short story. For another thing, it’s unimaginably ancient. The Bible’s story begins 2,000 years before the Common Era. I just read that a sizable portion of millennials don’t know what the Holocaust was. To them that’s ancient history - a mere 75 years back. The Bible is more than 4,000 years back. That’s unimaginably ancient. For yet another thing, it traffics in extremely complicated and sophisticated theology, plumbing in its unfolding the depths of such mysteries as our nature, the predicament that our nature has landed us in, and the means of our redemption. And it does so all the while purging itself of false starts or conclusions. So it may seem forbidding. But at the same time, ironically, the Bible lends itself to succinct summaries. Here’s one: God lives. Here’s another: Good triumphs over evil. And another: Love triumphs over fear. And another: Practice universal justice. And another: Love one another. And here’s one that’s right on point: Reach out. The Bible can be summarized in just two words. Reach out. Think about it. That’s what God did. God reached out. God reached out to Abraham and told him that from him would one day issue a nation, and not just any nation, but a nation that would somehow bless all the nations by bestowing upon them redemption. God reached out to Moses and bequeathed him an ethical law so that God’s people could bear his righteousness. God reached out to David and told him that from his descendants would emerge one who would embody that redemption. And that one in the fullness of time emerged. God reach out to his son. He told him that if he would make a great sacrifice, the greatest sacrifice, it would be the means for all people to reach out to one another. In a real way. A way that advanced God’s own being and cause. And his son made that sacrifice. And in his brief ministry that preceded that sacrifice, he reached out to everyone. And I mean everyone. Lepers. Prostitutes. Beggars. Even a bitter little man perched up in a sycamore tree. So reaching out is not just a good example. It is nothing less the mechanism that God that employs to bestow redemption. Yes, life can be hard. Paul knew this. “We would prefer to be away from the body and at home with the Lord.” But Paul goes on. “So we must make it our goal to please him, whether we are at home in the body or away from it.” And this means reaching out. “I feel so lost now. What am I going to do?” asked my grieving classmate. I told him that his coach had already showed him what to do. I told him to reach out. Amen.
By Rebecca Clancy August 2, 2022
Jesus was always one to bring the party. All he had to do was show up, and lots of others showed up too -- eager for engagement, eager for excitement, eager for something new. It was little wonder. Here at last was someone who had something to say. Something different. Something provocative. Something truthful. Jesus had a way of uttering truths that had never been uttered before, but at the same time, were strangely recognizable. And it was happening once again. Once again, Jesus had brought the party. He showed up at the house of Mary and Martha, and suddenly the place was filled with men who immediately took their place at his feet. This gesture was an indicator that they were ready and willing disciples. They wanted him to teach them. And so he began to teach. That was Martha’s cue. She sprang into action. After Jesus’ teaching, it would be fellowship hour, and as we all know, fellowship hour is predicated upon food. And in ancient times, you couldn’t rely on your reserves from Costco. Feeding a room full of men was labor intensive. Animals had to be slaughtered and dressed. Bread had to be baked. Water had to hauled. Martha went directly to work, expecting Mary to fall in place behind her. But what did Mary do? She went and sat at Jesus’ feet with the men -- shirking her role, defying expectations, and leaving Martha to shoulder the burden alone. I can imagine Martha’s frustration. I can imagine her passive aggressive attempts to get Mary back in the kitchen. Staring daggers at her from the threshold. Uttering loud sighs as indicators of her strain. Dropping pottery on the floor to startle Mary to awareness. But Mary took no notice. None whatsoever. Martha should have counted to ten. How much strife could be averted if we could all just remember to count to ten, or perhaps twenty. Martha for her part shot like a rocket from outrage to outburst. “I’m doing all the work in here Jesus, while Mary has yet to raise a finger. It’s hardly fair. And have you even noticed? Do you even care?” And there was doubtless more to it than the fact that Martha had to provide all the hospitality on her own. There too was the fact of what Mary was doing. She not day dreaming or singing idly out the window. She was sitting at Jesus’ feet. She was in there with the men. Martha was doubtless chagrined and embarrassed that Mary did not know her place. It certainly did not reflect well on the family. But Jesus did not vindicate Martha. Jesus chastised her, “Martha, Martha,” (and when someone says your name twice, wait for some kind of a correction to follow) “Why are you so distracted and stressed and scattered? Let it go. Mary’s right where she should be.” We’re left to wonder how Martha felt at that point. I bet she wasn’t happy. She simply didn’t get it or she would not have reacted that way in the first place. Now normally this text is interpreted as a caution against busyness. Martha with all her busyness is a prototype that we should avoid. Not that productivity is a bad thing. Idle hands are the devil’s workshop after all. But there’s a certain kind of busyness that’s not good. It’s when we become enmeshed with worldly or personal concerns and address them with obsessive application – application that mixes with pride, competition, insecurity. It becomes a kind of self-perpetuating force. And it causes us to lose all perspective. It causes us to become disoriented. We forget that we’re supposed to be at Jesus’ feet – his disciples, listening to him. And this is a fair enough interpretation, but I think there’s something else here. An elephant in the living room. Mary was right where she should be. She was at Jesus’ feet, his disciple, listening to him. But Mary was, obviously, a woman. Women did not seat themselves at the feet of rabbis. Women were not disciples. All they needed to know was taught to them by their mothers. Women did not sit side by side with men learning. It was unheard of. It was forbidden. And yet Jesus told Martha that Mary was right where she should be. Her place was with the men. Really Jesus? A woman’s place is with the men? Really Jesus? In first century Judaism? Jesus was a revolutionary and a radical, and don’t ever forget it. All down through history and even to this day there has an unspoken and inviolable code. It could be expressed as a variant of a line from the wedding ceremony. What society has divided, let no one unite. And Jesus was saying the polar opposite. A women’s place is with the men. Think about what this means by extension. Women, your place is with the men. Men, your place is with the women. Whites, your place is with blacks. Blacks your place is with whites. The wealthy, your place is with the poor, and the poor, your place is with the wealthy. The powerful, your place is with the powerless. The powerless, your place is with the powerful. The old, your place is with the young. The young, your place is with the old. Jesus was smashing down all dividing walls. His disciples are to be completely and utterly integrated. This is simply too radical, simply too revolutionary. But that’s who Jesus was. This is why he brought the party. It’s because he spoke God’s truth. Disciples are to be completely and utterly integrated, and this in service to humankind that is to be completely and utterly integrated. That all should be one. But this is so radical and revolutionary that it is very seldom approximated. It’s too hard. But is it really? Is it really that hard to forge the way? Is it really that hard to reach out? Is it really that hard to cross the aisle? To be vulnerable? To be risky? To be open? To be accepting? To be understanding? One thing’s for sure. It’s a lot easier than hanging on a cross in faith it could be so. Amen.
Share by: