I would like to talk to you this morning about Joseph of Arimathea.
Doubtless, you just stifled a yawn. Doubtless you just thought to yourself, “Joseph of Arimathea? Really? With all the tribulation in the world today? She’d like to talk to us this morning about Joseph of Arimathea? Who the heck is Joseph of Arimathea, anyway? I barely even heard of him.”
But yes, I would like to talk to you this morning about Joseph of Arimathea. He is featured in our gospel lesson, after all. So I will give you a moment to stifle a few more yawns, then I will proceed to talk to you this morning about Joseph of Arimathea.
Actually, we don’t know that much about him. We know that it is highly likely that he actually existed. We know this because he appears across all four gospels. When someone or something appears across all four gospels, that makes it fairly indubitable. This is because of John’s gospel. Mathew, Mark, and Luke are pretty much the same gospel. This means they depended on each other. Not John. John is independent of them. A full ninety percent of John is absent from the other three. So if something appears across all four gospels, it’s highly likely it happened. So it’s highly likely that Joseph of Arimathea actually existed. Beyond that, all that is known of him is what is recorded in the short paragraph all four gospels devote to him.
They tell us that Joseph of Arimathea was a member of the “Council”. That is to say, he was a member of the SanHedrin. The Romans permitted the Jews to govern themselves, and they did so through the SanHedrin, which was composed of their religious authorities.
It was the SanHedrin that found Jesus guilty of blasphemy and condemned him to death. But Joseph of Arimathea, to quote, “didn’t agree with their plan or action.” In other words, he saw through them. He saw through their jealousy. He saw through their resentment. Above all, he saw through their outrage. They, like so many people today, lacked the moral and mental clarity to know when to be outraged. Joseph of Arimathea, for his part, knew when to be outraged. He was outraged by the SanHedrin. He realized they had just lynched an innocent man. Joseph of Arimathea had admired Jesus, but what could he have done on his behalf in the face of the SanHedrin? Nothing. Nothing as yet anyway.
As Jesus hung dead on his cross, he approached Pontius PIlate and asked him for his body, Mark's version adds the word “boldly” to his request. He approached Pilate “boldly” and asked for his body. Mark is right to add the word. Because think about it. Pilate sentenced Jesus to death, assumedly, because he judged that Jesus deserved the sentence. In asking for Jesus’ body, Joseph of Arimathea was in essence challenging Pilate’s judgment. It was an act of subversion, really. In other words, he was putting himself at risk. Fortunately, Pilate’s indifference to the whole matter won out.
Joseph of Arimathea then proceeded to remove Jesus’ mangled and bloody corpse from his cross. Try to imagine that. This would have involved crow bars, ladders, and lots of sweat. But above all it would have involved a mangled and bloody corpse. We have a native aversion to corpses. It’s hard enough for us to glance at them when they have died of natural causes. That’s why we dress them up with makeup and wigs and make them into mannequins. That’s all we can handle. What Joseph of Arimathea handled was downright sickening.
And he didn’t need to do any of it. He didn’t need to do any of it because he was rich. He must have been rich because when he removed Jesus from the cross, he wrapped him in linen. Linen was exorbitantly expensive in those times. So he was rich, and the rich generally are freer to do what they want to do and not constrained to do what they need to do. He didn’t need to do any of it. No one else in the world bothered.
Finally, he laid Jesus in his own tomb; again, a rich man’s tomb, hewn from rock. And for his efforts, Joseph of Arimathea set the stage for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. He set the stage for the resurrection of Jesus Christ -- an event, the event, that transfuses worldly tribulation with divine triumph.
To say the very least of him, Joseph of Arimathea was a hero. He was one who advanced the good. He was one who defended the truth. He was one who set the example. He was one at the ready to sacrifice. He was one who made the world a better place, Yes, Joseph of Arimathea was a hero, but at the same time, he was an unsung hero. We stifle our yawns at the mention of his name.
And here’s the whole point.
There should be no unsung heroes, in the past or in the present. That expression should not even exist. Could we be so dull, so indifferent, so blind, so careless, so complacent, so jaded, so selfish, that we do not notice the heroes that we have been bequeathed and that surround us?
Because read theologically, and a Christian must read everything theologically, they can only be God’s gift to us. They can only be God’s gift to us because for their contributions they redeem worldly tribulation. So we must be ever alert to them and endow them with the honor they deserve. We must sing their praises at the top of our voices.
One of my favorite people, Fred Rogers, who himself was an unsung hero until recently, knew this well. He once said, “When I was a boy and I would see scary things in the news, my mother would say to me, ‘Look for the helpers. You will always find people who are helping.’” Amen.