If anyone knew the power of the spoken word, it was Adolph Hitler. In Mein Kampf, written nearly a decade before he rose to power, Hitler knew precisely the means to do so – the spoken word. “All great world shattering events,” he wrote, “have been wrought not by written matter, but by the spoken word.”
And after, by the spoken word, Hitler had risen to power; after Austria, Czechoslovakia, Norway, Denmark, Holland, and Belgium had fallen to Nazi aggression, Hitler, by the spoken word, retained power through speeches like this one to the German workers:
"We have already projected great plans. All of our plans have but one aim: To develop still further the great German State, to make the great German nation more and more conscious of its existence and, at the same time, to give it everything which makes life worth living…..
When this war is ended, Germany will set to work in earnest. A great ‘Awake!” will sound throughout the country…We shall show the world for the first time who is the real master…..[We] will grow the great German Reich of which the poets have dreamed. It will be the Germany to which every one of her sons will cling with fanatical devotion…..[Germany] will teach everyone the meaning of life.
Should anyone say to me: ‘These are mere fantastic dreams, mere visions,’ I can only reply that when I set out on my course in 1919 as an unknown, nameless soldier I built my hope of the future upon a most vivid imagination. Yet all has come true….The road from an unknown and nameless person to the Fuehrer of the German nation was harder than will be the way from the Fuehrer of the German nation to the creator of the coming peace!"
But across the English Channel was another who knew the power of the spoken word. In a contemporaneous speech given to the House of Commons very shortly before the Swastika would hang over the Eiffel Tower, Winston Churchill declared:
"That is the resolve of His Majesty’s Government – every man of them. That is the will of Parliament and the nation. The British Empire and the French Republic, linked together in their cause and in their need, will defend to the death their native soil, aiding each other like good comrades to the utmost of their strength.
Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender. And even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this island…was subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet would carry on the struggle, until, in God’s good time , the new world with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and liberation of the old."
The House of Commons responded to Churchill’s speech with a thunderous ovation. Its members stood and wept and pounded the benches before them. Franklin Delano Roosevelt responded to Churchill’s speech by abandoning this nation’s policy of neutrality and casting its lot behind Great Britain. The power of the spoken word.
Our spoken words, next to Hitler’s and Churchill’s, of course, will never fork such lightening. But if the spoken word indeed has power, our spoken words must have power too – power proportionate to our statures and stations. And too, as in the case with Hitler and Churchill, power for good and for ill.
This is probably better illustrated, however, not by gauging the effect of our own spoken words; for the effect of our own spoken words, I think, we tend to discount. It is better illustrated by gauging the effect of spoken words upon us.
We have all been soothed by words of comfort, relieved by words of mercy, enlightened by words of truth, and edified and fortified by words of faith. And conversely, we have all been angered by words of injustice, hurt by words of meanness or cruelty, discouraged by words of criticism, and stultified by words of triviality or inanity.
The Bible at any rate concurs with these observations. As James writes in this morning’s epistle lesson, “the tongue is a small member, yet it boasts of great exploits.”
And so, we may safely conclude that the spoken word and so our spoken words are powerful, powerful for good or for ill, and we may take from this conclusion the obvious lesson that we should be mindful and measured in our speech. But to this obvious lesson James adds something less obvious; less obvious, but decidedly more stern and exacting.
For James, throughout his epistle, displays a preoccupation with, as he puts it, “double-mindedness” – “Faith by itself,” he writes, “if it has no works, is dead. Be doers of the word and not merely hearers who deceive themselves.” And James brings his preoccupation with double-mindedness to bear upon the spoken word. “With [the tongue] we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse those who are made in the likeness of God. From the same mouth comes blessing and cursing.”
What James admonishes is that our Christian beliefs and our spoken words must be integrated. And this precludes, James argues, all words spoken for ill, for words spoken for ill cannot spring from our Christian beliefs, but only from, as he puts it, a "brackish spring." Our words spoken for good then when spoken along side our words spoken for ill can only issue from that same brackish spring and amount to nothing more than careless and mindless inconsistency, nothing more than hypocrisy: “If they think they are religious,” James warns, “and do not bridle their tongues, their religion is useless.”
To be sure stern and exacting, but some people are entitled to be stern and exacting. James was entitled. He had witnessed his brother, after all, tortured on a cross for the fledgling movement to which he now addressed himself, a movement for which he himself would shortly be martyred, a movement now being undermined by Christians who somehow believed that they could be Christians and say whatever they wanted. What’s more, he was no more stern and exacting than his brother.
Jesus in this morning’s gospel lesson was bound for Jerusalem. And so he warned his disciples what would befall him there. “The Son of Man is to be betrayed into human hands, and they will kill him, and three days after being killed, he will rise again.” It was his second warning to them of this nature. But, as Mark tells us, “They did not understand what he was saying, and they were afraid to ask.” The knowledge Jesus had attempted to impart to them would remain his alone. The burden he had tried to share with them he would be left bear alone. He could only hope that after his death they would recall his words and come to realize that his death was according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God.
But to make matters worse, his disciples, obviously unconcerned for their lack of understanding, and obviously unconcerned for him, immediately embarked upon a discussion as to who among them was the greatest! “What were you discussing?” Jesus asked. And in their shame they fell silent. Jesus knew of course full well what they were discussing. He asked the question in fact to censure them.
Jesus knew what his disciples were discussing, and Jesus knows too every word that issues from our mouths. The question he put to his disciples is too his question to us. “What are you discussing?” May we at all times be able to answer him boldly, “We were speaking words of mercy and forgiveness. We were speaking words of comfort, encouragement, and hope. We were speaking words of justice. We were speaking words of truth. We were speaking words of faith. We were speaking words of prayer. We were speaking all that you taught us to speak confident of the power of our spoken words for good, your father’s good.” Amen.