As a result of the pandemic, parents of school age children are confronted by two educational choices. The first choice is e-learning. E-learning is done remotely. Each morning students sign into their classrooms on their laptops, attendance is taken, and school proceeds similarly to how it used to, except it’s all online. The second choice is homeschooling. Homeschooling is when parents withdraw their students from school altogether, and the parents become the teachers.
Now it might seem that e-learning would be the
obvious
choice because it would appear the easier choice -- much easier to outsource all that teaching to the teachers. But such was not my experience of it last Spring when the pandemic first hit. It was, to put it bluntly, a lived nightmare. Partly it was my own fault because, as anyone can attest, technology is not my
forte. But even if I were stronger on the technology front, who wants to be given an instruction like this before you’ve had your morning coffee?
Using either the Clever platform or the Google Classroom platform or the Seesaw platform, sign in using the case sensitive passwords students were assigned in September and follow links to the social studies module where you will find detailed instructions for the Biome diorama to be shared on a Zoom meeting tomorrow at 11 am. No thanks. After living with E- learning last spring, homeschooling was for me clearly the lesser of two evils.
And to tell the truth, I have been pleasantly surprised, if not to say delighted, by homeschooling. Getting rid of the middle man, a.k.a., the teacher, has made things much more streamlined. And beyond that, if you keep up with math and reading, you can pretty much create your own curriculum based upon your interests and values.
For instance, and this may make me unpopular in this day and age, but I do not despise human civilization in general and western culture in particular. I want my children, though not to be impervious to their weaknesses, to be appreciative of their strengths. So my curriculum includes, besides ample units on the Bible, units on the biographies of individuals of eminence, units on fairy tales and nursery rhymes, units on music and art, units on Greek mythology, units on the discoveries of science, etc., etc.
Last week I introduced a new unit that I am particularly happy with -- a unit on famous parables. Talk about the perfect way to teach interpretation. And talk about rich material. There are the many parables of Jesus - parables being his preferred means of teaching. And there are Aesop's fables -- what a treasure trove! And there are all sorts of random classics, like the parable I read them most recently -
The Blind Men and the Elephant.
In case you are unfamiliar with it, it is about six blind men who hear that their prince has newly acquired an elephant. Curious to know what an elephant is, they make their way to it. The first man feels its side and knows it to be a wall. The second man feels its tusk and knows it to be a spear. The third man feels its ear and knows it to be a fan. The fourth man feels its leg and knows it to be a tree. The fifth man feels its tail and knows it to be a rope, and the sixth man feels its trunk and knows it to be a snake. And because each knows what an elephant is; and because their knowledge is at variance, they begin to argue with one another.
After I read it to them -- them being Herry and Adam, I asked them about its meaning. Now this parable has elicited interpretations of varied complexity. One interpretation declares it to be anti-Christian because it suggests that humankind is necessarily blind to comprehensive truth, thereby undermining the reliability and validity of revelation, but in consideration of my students, I was willing to accept a lower order interpretation. Herry actually got it, kind of. He said that the blind men were all wrong. Close enough. They were indeed all wrong. I expanded on his insight. “Yes, they were all wrong. So if you have only part of the truth,” I said, “you have a lie.” And this is undeniable. If you only have part of the truth, you have a lie. Think of the sworn testimony oath by way of example. “Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?” It implies that anything less than the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth is a lie.
All of this, believe it or not, has application to the Bible. People tend to interpret the Bible as the Blind men interpreted the elephant. They take one line and insist that it represents the whole. This has a name. It’s called proof texting. It happens all the time. It is, in fact, the most common form of biblical misinterpretation. But remember, if you have only part of the truth, you have a lie. So proof texting is a lie. It boils down to an excuse to read one’s own ignorance and prejudice into the Bible -- specifically condemned by the third commandment -- “You shall not take the Lord’s name in vain;” in other words, you are not to invoke the Lord’s name to sanction your own profane cause.
Consider this over against the most common proof texts. “Wives submit to your husband…. for the husband is the head of the wife,” suggesting that the whole of the Bible is about the necessity for a man to be at the top of the family hierarchy o- and by extension the human hierarchy.
“No one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again,” suggesting that the whole of the Bible is about a radical conversion experience that makes you an insider and others lacking it to be outsiders.
“And God said let there be light,” suggesting the whole of the Bible is to stand as a bulwark against science.
“Let everyone be subject to their governing authorities,” suggesting the whole of the Bible is to sanction obedience to the state and permit one to claim that he was only following orders.
So we must be wary of proof texting. We must be wary when we hear it in the mouths of others, and we must above all be wary when we hear it in our own mouths. Proof texting is a tempting but fraudulent game.
But by the same token, there are indeed some lines in the Bible that do tend to capture its spirit. It’s just that the proof texters never seem to lite on them. But once you’ve read the Bible and read it all, and once you’ve studied the Bible and studied it thoroughly, and once you submit to the Bible’s authority and submit to it humbly, you’re in a position to take a stab at it. I now make bold to make a stab.
“You shall have no other Gods before me.”
“The Lord is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love.”
“In Christ God was reconciling the world to himself.”
“For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son so that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.”
“In Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, male nor female, slave nor free.”
And from our gospel lesson, “Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.”
It can be seen to boil down to this. Any line that anticipates Jesus Christ; any line that reveals Jesus Christ, and any line that glorifies Jesus Christ - captures the spirit of the Bible, the whole of the Bible that makes us whole. Amen.
Rebecca's Sermons | All Rights Reserved |
Created by Olive + Ash.
Managed by Olive Street Design.