Blog Layout

The Bet

Rebecca Clancy

Genesis 2:4b-9, 3:1-7 Philippians 2:1-11 John 12:27-32

Imagine this. Imagine a huge arena. Now imagine it ten times bigger than you’ve just imagined it. Now imagine every seat filled so that there is a massive crowd -- tens -- no -- hundreds of thousands of people gathered to witness the contest. Now imagine yourself at the center of that arena. You can imagine yourself just as you are now or embellished in some way so you are at your very best - decked out in finery or armor, what have you. Now imagine facing your opponent, and your opponent is God.

How many from among the hundreds of thousands of people gathered there do you suppose would bet upon you to win the contest? I’ll give you a hint. The answer rhymes with hero. That’s right. It’s zero. There could be a million people gathered there, and the answer would still be zero. Even the atheists would bet against you, on principle. I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. Even you wouldn’t bet on yourself.
 
But then why in the world does Adam bet on himself in his contest with God? Why in the world would he have thought that he had the grounds? God had just formed him, and I quote, “out of the dust of the ground.” Two things here. Number one: Adam did not form himself. God formed him. This would seem to make God creator and Adam creature. Number two: Adam was formed “out of the dust of the ground.” He was dust. Adam’s name in Hebrew in fact means dustling. The point is he was basically made out of mud.

After forming him, God provided for him a habitat and a vocation - the Garden of Eden, and he was to till and keep it. With one caveat. He was, on penalty of death, expressly forbidden to touch the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. This is because God knew that he couldn’t handle the knowledge of good and evil. He could not choose rightly between them. He would be subject to God on that score. And this guy was about to bet on himself in his contest with God.

God then determined that Adam should not be alone. Some creatures should be alone, like tigers and hamsters. God created them for solitude. But God created Adam for community. So once again out of the dust of the ground he formed this animal and that, but none quite fit the bill. God then had a brainstorm. He fashioned a woman from his rib, so that she would be his own flesh and blood. And Adam was no longer alone.

But then...enter the crafty serpent. He tricked Eve into tricking Adam into not just touching, but eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. “God’s just being territorial,” the crafty serpent tempted her. “Go ahead and eat. It won’t do you any harm. Just the opposite, it will make you just like God, able to choose rightly between good and evil.”

Now I don’t know about you, but if a crafty serpent hissed blandishments into in my ear, it would, in and of itself, raise suspicions in my mind. Blandishments of a crafty serpent over against the fact that God had just fashioned me out of the dust of the earth. Blandishments of a crafty serpent over against the fact that God had just expressly forbidden me, on penalty of death, to touch the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Not Adam. He bet on himself. He reached for the fruit.
 
It didn’t turn out all that well for him. He did receive a kind of knowledge, but it was the knowledge that he was a guilty and shameful creature for betting on himself.

The whole thing’s unfathomable, really. Let’s not mince words. Adam was, inexplicably, a fool for betting on himself. Thank God we are nothing like him. But just a second here. In point of fact, the reason the Bible describes Adam as our spiritual forebear is because we bear him so close a resemblance. Like father like child. The fact that we judge him though we are just like him indicates that we may be in denial. So let’s just own up to it. Let’s just admit it. We too bet on ourselves in our contest with God. But why? We know, like Adam, we’ve got no grounds to do so. None whatsoever. So why in the world do we bet on ourselves in our contest with God?

The passage does not say precisely, but I have my own idea. It’s because we desperately want our freedom. And we have the impression that if we bet on God we will lose our freedom. We desperately want our freedom! If we bet on God we will have to submit; we will have to obey; we will have to be answerable. But our impressions, just because they’re ours, doesn’t mean they’re right. This particular impression is a decided misimpression. Nothing, in fact, can be further from the truth. If we bet on God we don’t lose our freedom. If we bet on ourselves we lose our freedom. It’s precisely because, just as God told Adam, we can’t rightly choose between the knowledge of good and evil. So when we bet on ourselves we become imprisoned, imprisoned by ourselves.

We have all seen examples of this. They’re all over the place. Watch for them, and you’ll see them. A couple weeks ago, the Lottery reached something close to a billion dollars, so there were special interest stories on the internet about past Lottery winners. They read as horror stories. One was entitled, Twenty Five Lottery Winners And Where They Are Now. Number one declared bankruptcy after purchasing two yachts. Number two spent millions of dollars bailing her drug pushing, gang banging boyfriend out of jail. Number three spent a sizable part of his winnings hiring a hit man to murder his wife. Don’t make me go on.

Only if we bet on God we will have the freedom we so desperately want. Only if we allow God to choose for us the knowledge of good and evil, will we be free from ourselves, free to find the purpose we were created to find, free to bear the responsibility we were created to bear, free to follow the direction we were created to follow, free to make the decisions we were created to make, free to enact the truth we were created to enact.

Bottom line: Adam bet on himself in his contest with God, and he lost. When we bet on ourselves in our contest with God, we repeat his error. We lose. This is why Adam is offered to us as a bad example to resist. But we are offered more than a bad example to resist. We are offered a good example to follow. That good example is, of course, his God’s son Jesus Christ.

For Jesus Christ, there was no contest with God in the first place. He simply bet on God every step of the way. At his baptism when God imparted to him that he was called to make a supreme sacrifice for the sake of humankind, he bet on God. Throughout his ministry as he was hindered and harassed and discouraged and disparaged by every incarnation of corruption and falsehood imaginable, he bet on God. At the end of his ministry, when his dearest and most trusted friends and followers to a man denied and deserted him, he bet on God. When he made that supreme sacrifice on his cross, he bet on God. Of course he bet on God. Only a man who bet body mind and soul on God could have used his freedom in that way.

For our part, we have a new spiritual forbear we may strive to resemble. We are no longer in Adam. We are in Jesus Christ.

My grandmother, God rest her soul, should have been titled, The Queen of the Proverbs. I don’t recall her ever using the narrative voice. She communicated exclusively in proverbs. And she had one for every occasion. “Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead.” “Lost time is never found again.” “Speak little, do much.” “What you would appear to be, be.” I thought growing up that my grandmother was very odd. As I grow nearer and nearer her age, I realize many of those proverbs were spot on. My grandmother had her share of the wisdom of Solomon. And the thing about proverbs over against the narrative voice is that proverbs you tend to remember. My grandmother would have understood what I have said. Because once she said to me, “When you’re the best that you can be, then you will be truly free.” Amen.

By Rebecca Clancy August 3, 2022
Pharaoh, King of Egypt, enslaved the People of Israel. It was not out, as you might assume, out of cruelty. It was, rather, out of judiciousness. The People of Israel were not Egyptians. They were foreigners. They were the rough equivalent of what we today would call the undocumented. So now as then they were deemed to be threats. Add to this that the People of Israel grew increasingly numerous, as numerous even as the Egyptians themselves. This intensified the threat. In those numbers they could simply take over. Or Egypt’s enemies could induce them to fight for them, as a kind of built in fifth column. Pharaoh, King of Egypt, had to act. And so he enslaved the People of Israel. It was the judicious thing to do. But his judiciousness was not rewarded. In slavery, unpredictably, their numbers only increased. Pharaoh’s patience with the People of Israel grew thin. Judiciousness then crossed over to cruelty. He ordered the Hebrew midwives to murder the infant boys as they delivered them. That would thin their ranks. But the Hebrew midwives refused to do so, and with their refusal, civil disobedience was born. They chose to heed God not man. But Pharaoh King of Egypt was not so easily undone. He ordered his army to search out the infant boys and throw them into the Nile. Thereafter, cruelty no doubt took on a life of its own. Pharaoh King of Egypt rightly ranks with the likes of Caligula, Nero, Hitler, Stalin, and Mao. One wonders why it is that so many who rise to power become murderous and maniacal tyrants. The human cost - the suffering and misery and despair and tragedy -- are unimaginable and incalculable. Against this backdrop, a woman from the house of Levi gave birth to a healthy and beautiful infant boy. It would normally be the occasion for celebration and joy, but it was for her the occasion for anguish. When a child is born, a mother’s first instinct is protectiveness. But how could she possibly protect him? She thought desperately at first that she could hide him, and she did so for several months, but that could not go on forever. He could any day be discovered. The lesser of two evils was to abandon him to his fate. So she plastered a reed basket with bitumen and pitch, and she cast her hope upon the water. Low and behold, the daughter of Pharaoh happened upon the basket. She peered into it, beheld the crying infant, and she had compassion. The daughter of Pharaoh has never received the appreciation and respect she deserves. She is, inexplicably, overlooked. What she did was exemplary. Normally when people enslave others, they find justification for it. The enslaved are not deemed the equal of their enslavers. They are deemed subhuman. Slavery, therefore, is a necessity. More than this, it is morally right. That’s what the South advanced in this country, after all. But the daughter of Pharaoh did not fall prey to justification. She had compassion. And she acted upon that compassion. Here is an important reminder. It is not enough to have compassion. To have compassion, or any other altruistic emotion for that matter, does not make you a good person. You must act upon it. If you have compassion and you do not act upon it, that makes you decidedly less than a good person. As Martin Luther King, Jr. famously declared, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” And here is something truly astounding. Her act was to adopt him. That was, to say at the least, a courageous thing to do. It certainly would not have put her in good stead with her father. I can just imagine it. “Father, I have a surprise for you. You have a new grandson.” Such an announcement could only have dumbfounded him, but his confusion would have given way to horror as she went on, “I have adopted an infant boy from among your slaves.” If nothing else, we can now set the record straight. We can give Pharaoh’s daughter the appreciation and respect that she deserves. But we can do more than that. As I said, she is exemplary, and so we can follow her example. We can show compassion to those who have cast their hope upon the water. Yes, a mother forced by dire circumstance to give her child up for adoption, hoping that her child will be loved and cherished. But too, one with an atypical identity, hoping to be accepted for who he or she really is. One of a different race, creed, or income level seeking to relocate, hoping not that she will be welcomed, for that would be too high a hope; but hoping she will be at least be tolerated. One who has transgressed, hoping he will be forgiven. One who has something difficult to impart, hoping she will be understood. We can show compassion for those who have cast their hope upon the water. For someone greater, much greater than Pharaoh’s daughter did the same. “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on us!” “My daughter has just died. Come and lay your hand on her, that she may live.” “Even now I know that God will give you whatever you ask of him.” “Jesus, come before my son dies.” “Lord, if you choose, you can make me clean.” “Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David, for my daughter is tormented by a demon.” “Lord, have mercy on my son, for he is an epileptic and suffers terribly.” “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom” They cast their hope on him. And he showed compassion for them all. And when we cast our hope on him, he will show compassion for us -- unlimited even by a cross. Amen.
By Rebecca Clancy August 3, 2022
I attended a funeral recently. It was for my high school math teacher. He was one great guy. Everyone loved him. He taught math at my high school for forty years, and he also coached wrestling. By the time he retired, he had become something of a legend in his own time. The funeral was upbeat, not like so many funerals that are so very sad. He lived a full and long life, and we gathered to celebrate that. But for one man – a classmate of mine who wrestled for him. He was absolutely devastated. I approached him in the parking lot after the funeral and asked if he was okay. He broke down. “That man was everything to me,” he said. “I was O.K. so long as he was in the world.” Then he shared his story. His mother died when he was very young. His father was a physically and emotionally abusive alcoholic. By the time he was in high school, he was far down a bad road. He hadn’t the support to do well at school, so he didn’t. He was very angry, so he was a behavior problem. The only friends he could make were kids like himself, so he hung out with a tough crowd. And he had begun to dabble in drugs. He was pretty much a lost cause at the age of sixteen. Enter my math teacher. He approached him one day out of the blue and told him he could tell by his gait that he was born to wrestle. This could only have been a ruse to intervene. Even I, who knows nothing about wrestling, am suspicious that you can identify one born to wrestle by his gait. At any rate, the ruse worked. He intervened. And he made him into a great wrestler. On top of that, he made him into a great young man. His advice, understanding, and support were unwavering. He helped him to deal with his past in such a way that it didn’t destroy him. He filled his present with new found responsibility, purpose, structure, and discipline. And he paved his way to a future. After graduation he went to college on a wrestling scholarship and eventually became a doctor. “I feel so lost,” he concluded his story. “What am I going to do now?” While he was sharing his story, I could not help but think how hard life can be. We here are generally prosperous and privileged, so we can afford to put up a front. But behind that front life can be hard. Because it’s out there -- loss, abuse, addiction, and a host of other afflictions. It’s enough to make you lose your way. And as I said, we here are generally prosperous and privileged. What if the loss, abuse, and addiction are compounded by poverty or racism? Then it’s all but a foregone conclusion. Your way is lost. Yes, life can be hard. Life takes casualties. Lots of them. It can make us feel helpless and overwhelmed. We want to make things better, but what could we possibly do? The answer is no farther away than my late math teacher. What could we possibly do to make things better? We could reach out, like he did. And what is in view here is not merely a good example, although we must never underestimate the power of a good example and must always strive to be one. But there’s more in view than that. It has to do with the Bible. The Bible may seem like a forbidding book. For one thing it’s thousands of pages long. It makes War and Peace look like a short story. For another thing, it’s unimaginably ancient. The Bible’s story begins 2,000 years before the Common Era. I just read that a sizable portion of millennials don’t know what the Holocaust was. To them that’s ancient history - a mere 75 years back. The Bible is more than 4,000 years back. That’s unimaginably ancient. For yet another thing, it traffics in extremely complicated and sophisticated theology, plumbing in its unfolding the depths of such mysteries as our nature, the predicament that our nature has landed us in, and the means of our redemption. And it does so all the while purging itself of false starts or conclusions. So it may seem forbidding. But at the same time, ironically, the Bible lends itself to succinct summaries. Here’s one: God lives. Here’s another: Good triumphs over evil. And another: Love triumphs over fear. And another: Practice universal justice. And another: Love one another. And here’s one that’s right on point: Reach out. The Bible can be summarized in just two words. Reach out. Think about it. That’s what God did. God reached out. God reached out to Abraham and told him that from him would one day issue a nation, and not just any nation, but a nation that would somehow bless all the nations by bestowing upon them redemption. God reached out to Moses and bequeathed him an ethical law so that God’s people could bear his righteousness. God reached out to David and told him that from his descendants would emerge one who would embody that redemption. And that one in the fullness of time emerged. God reach out to his son. He told him that if he would make a great sacrifice, the greatest sacrifice, it would be the means for all people to reach out to one another. In a real way. A way that advanced God’s own being and cause. And his son made that sacrifice. And in his brief ministry that preceded that sacrifice, he reached out to everyone. And I mean everyone. Lepers. Prostitutes. Beggars. Even a bitter little man perched up in a sycamore tree. So reaching out is not just a good example. It is nothing less the mechanism that God that employs to bestow redemption. Yes, life can be hard. Paul knew this. “We would prefer to be away from the body and at home with the Lord.” But Paul goes on. “So we must make it our goal to please him, whether we are at home in the body or away from it.” And this means reaching out. “I feel so lost now. What am I going to do?” asked my grieving classmate. I told him that his coach had already showed him what to do. I told him to reach out. Amen.
By Rebecca Clancy August 2, 2022
Jesus was always one to bring the party. All he had to do was show up, and lots of others showed up too -- eager for engagement, eager for excitement, eager for something new. It was little wonder. Here at last was someone who had something to say. Something different. Something provocative. Something truthful. Jesus had a way of uttering truths that had never been uttered before, but at the same time, were strangely recognizable. And it was happening once again. Once again, Jesus had brought the party. He showed up at the house of Mary and Martha, and suddenly the place was filled with men who immediately took their place at his feet. This gesture was an indicator that they were ready and willing disciples. They wanted him to teach them. And so he began to teach. That was Martha’s cue. She sprang into action. After Jesus’ teaching, it would be fellowship hour, and as we all know, fellowship hour is predicated upon food. And in ancient times, you couldn’t rely on your reserves from Costco. Feeding a room full of men was labor intensive. Animals had to be slaughtered and dressed. Bread had to be baked. Water had to hauled. Martha went directly to work, expecting Mary to fall in place behind her. But what did Mary do? She went and sat at Jesus’ feet with the men -- shirking her role, defying expectations, and leaving Martha to shoulder the burden alone. I can imagine Martha’s frustration. I can imagine her passive aggressive attempts to get Mary back in the kitchen. Staring daggers at her from the threshold. Uttering loud sighs as indicators of her strain. Dropping pottery on the floor to startle Mary to awareness. But Mary took no notice. None whatsoever. Martha should have counted to ten. How much strife could be averted if we could all just remember to count to ten, or perhaps twenty. Martha for her part shot like a rocket from outrage to outburst. “I’m doing all the work in here Jesus, while Mary has yet to raise a finger. It’s hardly fair. And have you even noticed? Do you even care?” And there was doubtless more to it than the fact that Martha had to provide all the hospitality on her own. There too was the fact of what Mary was doing. She not day dreaming or singing idly out the window. She was sitting at Jesus’ feet. She was in there with the men. Martha was doubtless chagrined and embarrassed that Mary did not know her place. It certainly did not reflect well on the family. But Jesus did not vindicate Martha. Jesus chastised her, “Martha, Martha,” (and when someone says your name twice, wait for some kind of a correction to follow) “Why are you so distracted and stressed and scattered? Let it go. Mary’s right where she should be.” We’re left to wonder how Martha felt at that point. I bet she wasn’t happy. She simply didn’t get it or she would not have reacted that way in the first place. Now normally this text is interpreted as a caution against busyness. Martha with all her busyness is a prototype that we should avoid. Not that productivity is a bad thing. Idle hands are the devil’s workshop after all. But there’s a certain kind of busyness that’s not good. It’s when we become enmeshed with worldly or personal concerns and address them with obsessive application – application that mixes with pride, competition, insecurity. It becomes a kind of self-perpetuating force. And it causes us to lose all perspective. It causes us to become disoriented. We forget that we’re supposed to be at Jesus’ feet – his disciples, listening to him. And this is a fair enough interpretation, but I think there’s something else here. An elephant in the living room. Mary was right where she should be. She was at Jesus’ feet, his disciple, listening to him. But Mary was, obviously, a woman. Women did not seat themselves at the feet of rabbis. Women were not disciples. All they needed to know was taught to them by their mothers. Women did not sit side by side with men learning. It was unheard of. It was forbidden. And yet Jesus told Martha that Mary was right where she should be. Her place was with the men. Really Jesus? A woman’s place is with the men? Really Jesus? In first century Judaism? Jesus was a revolutionary and a radical, and don’t ever forget it. All down through history and even to this day there has an unspoken and inviolable code. It could be expressed as a variant of a line from the wedding ceremony. What society has divided, let no one unite. And Jesus was saying the polar opposite. A women’s place is with the men. Think about what this means by extension. Women, your place is with the men. Men, your place is with the women. Whites, your place is with blacks. Blacks your place is with whites. The wealthy, your place is with the poor, and the poor, your place is with the wealthy. The powerful, your place is with the powerless. The powerless, your place is with the powerful. The old, your place is with the young. The young, your place is with the old. Jesus was smashing down all dividing walls. His disciples are to be completely and utterly integrated. This is simply too radical, simply too revolutionary. But that’s who Jesus was. This is why he brought the party. It’s because he spoke God’s truth. Disciples are to be completely and utterly integrated, and this in service to humankind that is to be completely and utterly integrated. That all should be one. But this is so radical and revolutionary that it is very seldom approximated. It’s too hard. But is it really? Is it really that hard to forge the way? Is it really that hard to reach out? Is it really that hard to cross the aisle? To be vulnerable? To be risky? To be open? To be accepting? To be understanding? One thing’s for sure. It’s a lot easier than hanging on a cross in faith it could be so. Amen.
Share by: