When I was a girl of about ten, my dog Calvin died. I took it badly. I loved Calvin very dearly. But beyond that, this was my first brush with death -- its utterly uncompromising inexorability and finality. It was a foretaste of a reality I was not yet prepared to bear. My grief and dread were overwhelming.
Out of concern for me, my parents sent me to spend a week at my great aunt and uncle’s farm in Iowa. They hoped the trip would distract me and provide me distance from all the homely reminders of Calvin. But the trip only served to increase my misery.
My great aunt and uncle were staunch Roman Catholics from the Vatican I era. On Sunday morning, my great aunt pinned a doily on my head and brought me to church. The day was already off to a bad start. If a doily belonged pinned on my head during church, I was certain my father would have pinned one there prior to this. After a worship service strange to my experience, I was led to church school by an authority figure also strange to my experience -- a nun. In the course of class, I mentioned Calvin’s death. The nun gave me a look that revealed, her religious vocation notwithstanding, she had ice water in her veins and a heart of granite. “Animals do not have souls,” she instructed me coldly, in a tone of judgmental admonition, I suppose for what she deemed wrong-headed, self- indulgent moping.
Normally disputatious by nature and especially eager to argue what, at that early juncture would have to be described as proto-theological positions, I would have taken her on. I knew what she was trying to tell me -- that Calvin was only an animal, that when animals die they do not go to heaven, that their import is of limited significance, and that their deaths don’t warrant mourning. But she couldn’t have been right. Calvin was a member of my family. The fact that he happened to be a dog seemed a trivial point. In my family he was just like the rest of us. He had his own place and personality. Most important, he loved and was loved. How could he be excluded from God’s plan? And she was not, I knew, only wrong but mean. Children know, as if by instinct, when they are mistreated by adults. Her meanness deserved to have been exposed by acknowledgment of it or resistance to it. But Calvin’s death had left me weak and defenseless. I let her remark go unchallenged, and somehow it made everything all the worse.
Now many years have passed, and I am safely over Calvin’s death, if I ever encounter that nun again, I will certainly revisit the matter. The matter raised that morning -- usually, thank heaven, under less emotional circumstances -- is not an uncommon one. Children tend to endow animals with souls, and adults tend to feel compelled to correct them for it, or at least to write it off as childish sentimentality or idealism.
To tell the truth, I come down on the side of children. Children’s vantage point from time to time permits them to see things more clearly than adults. Their vantage point in this case is similar to animals’ -- both are vulnerable to and dependent upon adult intention for them. Out of empathy for animals, perhaps, and granted out of childish sentimentality and idealism as well, they see, though rightly I think, in the exclusion of animals from God’s plan, a deviation in what they hope to be God’s nature. And adults, as far as I can tell, take their side out of something less noble -- out of a basic lack of appreciation of and sympathy for animals, sometimes even a dislike of them on some general principle -- dirtiness or messiness or peskiness or lowliness -- this, and vague sense that some religious doctrine supports them. It may come as a surprise that the Bible comes down on the side of children too. The Bible doesn’t speak of animals having souls, nor of human beings having souls for that matter. This is a common misconception about the Bible. But the Bible does bespeak the essential unity between humans and animals, indeed the essential unity of all creation. The same word that went forth from God created us all.
And that essential unity of all creation is rendered all the more profound and poignant by the apostle Paul’s recognition in this morning’s epistle lesson that the essential unity of all creation extends too to its subjection to futility. Paul recognizes that all creation -- in its incompleteness, in its imperfection, above all in its mortality, shares a common plight. It was Darwin in the modern era who demonstrated the extreme waste, inefficiency, and suffering in nature. It drove him in fact to atheism.
But the apostle Paul also recognizes in this morning’s epistle lesson that the essential unity of all creation extends too to its redemption. All creation, in his words, “will be set free from its bondage to decay.” All creation then shares an essential unity, not only in its creation, but in its subjection to futility and its promised redemption.
And this is not singular the view of the Paul. The weight of the biblical witness is squarely behind him. The covenant in the Bible, the covenant made to Noah, is a covenant that promises the redemption of all creation. “As for me, I do hereby establish my covenant with you and your descendants, and with every living creature that is with you, the birds, the domestic animals, and the wild beasts with you . . . I establish my covenant with you…” The prophet Isaiah foresaw the fulfillment of that redemption as a peaceable kingdom where, “The wolf shall live with the lamb, the leopard shall lie down with the kid, the calf and the lion and the fatling together, and a little child will lead them.” The book of Revelation foresees it as, “A new heaven and a new earth, where God will wipe the tear from every eye and death will be no more.” Most important, Jesus’ still of storm and walking on water both demonstrate and presage the redemption of creation.
We human beings do indeed play a unique role in God’s plan. We alone, the Bible says, are made in God’s image. This means that we alone are fashioned and elect to know that we are not merely creatures of nature, subject to or defined by its laws; but that we are too creatures of God subject to and defined by God who created us and had redeemed us in Jesus Christ. And further, as the apostle Paul recognizes in this morning’s epistle lesson, we alone are fashioned and elect to know that through our redemption in Jesus Christ, we are the “first fruits” of the redemption of all creation. Yes, we play a unique role in God’s plan. It is the role, as the first fruits of the redemption of all creation, of responsible, informed, caring agency to it.
And this means we must finally forswear the bogus theologies that had no claim in the first place save the claim of human conceit that creation is nothing more than the set for the drama of redemption in which we play the only role. These theologies are not only unbiblical, but they have been supplied as license for the desecration and violation, the plunder and spoliation of creation for sport or for greed, and have brought creation now to the brink of ecological disaster.
But of course, the situation, like all situations of existence, is difficult and complex, because at the same time we must benefit from creation, often at its expense. This, as Darwin also demonstrated, is the law of existence for all creation, as it groans for redemption. But if we want to live in and live out this paradox according to biblical theology, our relationship to creation must be in a larger context of respect, sympathy, and harmony.
And this means finally that if children ask us if animals are included in God’s plan, we can with honesty and confidence tell them that our God is a God whose eye is on the sparrow, and that indeed they are. Amen.